<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Advanced Stats 101: Player Shooting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hoopsaddict.com/2008/07/18/advanced-stats-101-player-shooting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hoopsaddict.com/2008/07/18/advanced-stats-101-player-shooting/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Advanced Stats 101: Defense&#160;&#124;&#160;Hoops Addict</title>
		<link>http://hoopsaddict.com/2008/07/18/advanced-stats-101-player-shooting/#comment-7549</link>
		<dc:creator>Advanced Stats 101: Defense&#160;&#124;&#160;Hoops Addict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 17:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hoopsaddict.com/?p=1084#comment-7549</guid>
		<description>[...] recently in this continuing space, Advanced Stats 101 has looked at APBRmetrics for Player Shooting as well as exploring Team and Player Offensive Ratings. Given the old adage that defense wins [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently in this continuing space, Advanced Stats 101 has looked at APBRmetrics for Player Shooting as well as exploring Team and Player Offensive Ratings. Given the old adage that defense wins [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khandor</title>
		<link>http://hoopsaddict.com/2008/07/18/advanced-stats-101-player-shooting/#comment-7264</link>
		<dc:creator>khandor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 00:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hoopsaddict.com/?p=1084#comment-7264</guid>
		<description>IMHO no one who considers himself to be a basketball expert would use FG% to illustrate an individual's overall ability to shoot the ball in the first place. 'New Age Stats' like TS% attempt to quantify what actual basketball experts have known and been able to judge correctly for a long time by simply watching the game closely and attending accurately what specific players actually do well (or not) when they're on the court. Even so, a simple stat like TS% is also flawed as it fails to account for innumerable other variables as well which are important to an accurate assessment of which players are the best shooters overall within a specific set of individuals. Human observation by a skilled practicioner remains the best judge of basketball ability not statistical analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO no one who considers himself to be a basketball expert would use FG% to illustrate an individual&#8217;s overall ability to shoot the ball in the first place. &#8216;New Age Stats&#8217; like TS% attempt to quantify what actual basketball experts have known and been able to judge correctly for a long time by simply watching the game closely and attending accurately what specific players actually do well (or not) when they&#8217;re on the court. Even so, a simple stat like TS% is also flawed as it fails to account for innumerable other variables as well which are important to an accurate assessment of which players are the best shooters overall within a specific set of individuals. Human observation by a skilled practicioner remains the best judge of basketball ability not statistical analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoops Addict Article - Advanced Stats 101-2 &#171; The On Deck Circle</title>
		<link>http://hoopsaddict.com/2008/07/18/advanced-stats-101-player-shooting/#comment-7237</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoops Addict Article - Advanced Stats 101-2 &#171; The On Deck Circle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hoopsaddict.com/?p=1084#comment-7237</guid>
		<description>[...] Check it out! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Check it out! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
